HomeNational NewsThis should not have happened... SC expressed displeasure over Rijiju's comment on...

This should not have happened… SC expressed displeasure over Rijiju’s comment on collegium system


Keeping his point on the displeasure of the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General said that sometimes the news published in the media is also wrong.

This should not have happened... SC expressed displeasure over Rijiju's comment on collegium system

The Supreme Court reprimanded the central government.

Image Credit source: TV9

collegium system Union Law Minister regarding Kiren Rijiju on the comment made by Supreme Court expressed displeasure. On the comment made by the Union Minister on the collegium system of appointment of judges, the Supreme Court said that this should not have happened. Along with this, the Supreme Court completely rejected the comment made by the Law Minister on TV on the collegium.

A bench of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice AS Oka said, the comment made by the Union Minister on the collegium system should not have happened. Keeping his point on the displeasure of the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General said that sometimes the news published in the media is also wrong. Let us tell you that recently Law Minister Kiren Rijiju has called the collegium system as an alien.

Center reprimanded on the names sent by the collegium

  1. The Supreme Court reprimanded the Central Government on Monday for the names sent by the collegium. During the hearing, the Supreme Court asked the Attorney General that why the government has not yet approved the names sent from the Collegium?
  2. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul said that it appears that the government is unhappy that the NJAC has not got constitutional validity. But this cannot be done if you do not approve the names for a long time and keep the file on hold. The next hearing of the case will be on December 8.
  3. Justice Kaul said that the government cannot withdraw the names without giving its objections. I did not comment on the names of the High Court, because 4 months had not passed, but these names are pending for one and a half years. You are getting disappointed with the manner of appointment, we have issued notice only to find out the problem.
  4. Justice Kaul said that once the name is repeated, what is the point of naming it like this. This means that you completely break the seniority, the collegium takes into consideration all this. This is a very difficult situation.
  5. Senior advocate Vikas Singh said that if contempt is done, then they will do it. In response, the Supreme Court said that the deadline has been set, it has to be followed. There are so many cases pending. Good people should attend the bench and follow the deadline unless there is an exception.
  6. The Attorney General said that I can show you how to increase the credibility of this process. On this, the Supreme Court said that if the AG is saying that it is being looked into, then it is quite appropriate.
  7. Both SG and AG should work here and thus double barrel. You should understand the concern. Once the time limit is fixed, it should be followed. Once the time limit is fixed, it should be followed.
  8. Let us tell you that the Law Minister had said that due to the decision of the courts or some judges, anything can be totally alien to the Constitution. In such a situation, how can you expect that the country will support that decision.
  9. Rijiju said that the collegium system is completely unfamiliar terminology towards our constitution. He said, you tell me in which provision the collegium system has been mentioned.



Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments